Balance and Diversify
Debian Women Project
The Debian Women project was founded in May 2004. We seek to balance and diversify the Debian Project by actively engaging with interested women and encouraging them to become more involved with Debian. We will promote women's involvement in Debian by increasing the visibility of active women, providing mentoring and role models, and creating opportunities for collaboration with new and current members of the Debian Project. We welcome the involvement of all people who are interested in increasing the participation of women in Debian.
Via
Susan Crawford's Foo morning cont.
See also:
Diversity Management at IBM by Claudia Alban
and
«In kulturelle Integration muss viel investiert werden»
Der HSG-Professor Winfried Ruigrok hält den Nutzen von Diversity Management für schwer messbar, ist aber von der Relevanz der Diversität im Unternehmen überzeugt.
Mozilla, its subsidiary and Karim Lakhani's cool thoughts
You heard by now from
Mozilla's subsidiary via Joi or the NYT.
Via
Joi's post, I also found this
gem from Karim Lakhani. It resonates well with my last post.
Finally I think this move has significant implications for social movements that care about changing the world at large. Most social movements are based on protest and boycotts. The means of fighting back against corporate and governmental institutions have always been to apply popular pressure on them. Open source communities have shown, that instead of protest, a focus on building alternative viable solutions can have much lasting and permanent impact. Building solutions that direclty compete in the marketplace puts pressure on firms in a way that boycotts and demonstration never can. Imagine if the living wage campaign, instead of just boycotting Nike, had formed an alternative company, lets call it Mikey!, producing hip athletic shoes and clothing made by fairly paid developing country workers. Imagine if they had created their own catchy slogans and gained significant market share against Nike. Imagine if the environmental movement had funded and created viable alternative sources of energy instead of merely protesting greenhouse gasses and nuclear power. Imagine the creation of GreenCar corporation manufacturing and selling hydrogen powered cars or ConSolar/Wind selling solar and wind generated electricity. Few social movements move beyond the repertoire of protest, disruption, violence, boycotts and show of solidarity in large numbers to the creation of whole, sustainable, alternative solutions in agreement with their concerns and grievances. This move by Mozilla Foundation is a further step in the right direction of social responsibility, profitability and community purpose.
SEOpen: The SEO Firefox Extension
The spread of Creative Commons
the spread(of)CC
The current spread of
Creative Commons.
Lawrence Lessig: "The green are countries where the project has launched. The yellow are close. The red is yet to be liberated."
See also:
Creative Commons Weblog Switzerland
On Lessig's map Switzerland is still yellow, so I am wondering when the swiss CC will be officially launched. I have to ask
Mike or
Urs, I guess.
The commodification of the hacker ethic
Hmm...
Anne Galloway has definitely a point here. I like what the BBC and the BFI do, especially compared to our situation here, but more and more everything is blurred. Just think about
the recent partnership of
the bank of the establishment and
the hard- and software company with the rebel image.
But when Microsoft or the BBC want me to "play" with their products it's different from when I play with my friends and peers. Not necessarily worse, and wonderful in all sorts of ways, but different nonetheless. Started as basically DIY efforts, Flickr has become Flickr/Yahoo and Dodgeball has become Dodgeball/Google. Blogging the latest conference I attended or building patio furniture from the latest issue of Ready-Made is different than squatter entrepreneurship. Assembled relations shift, will continue to shift, and that's never a neutral occurrence. And you know what? When I moderated the Designing for Hackability panel at DIS last summer, I could not engage one single person on the implications of commodifying the hacker or DIY ethic. In worst case scenarios I was shut down by the claim that such concerns were utterly irrelevant.
Scope vs. Scale
[...] hackability enables economies of scope, which are the most difficult to realize at the the same time as economies of scale.
A very good point from Ross and which has a lot to do with how one thinks about a lot of things...
Via
Marko